-
Posts
20,700 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
146
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by BrooksBurner
-
Playoffs 2023-24 ECQF #1: Rangers vs. Washington Capitals — Teeth Out
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
Only applies to playoff OT, typically -
Playoffs 2023-24 ECQF #1: Rangers vs. Washington Capitals — Teeth Out
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
The league obviously wants to neuter the fuck out of Rempe -
Playoffs 2023-24 ECQF #1: Rangers vs. Washington Capitals — Teeth Out
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
-
Playoffs 2023-24 ECQF #1: Rangers vs. Washington Capitals — Teeth Out
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
I told my wife not to bother me and the kids were all hers for the next few hours, so I’m giving up sex for at least a week to watch this game. -
Lafrenière Re-Re-Reset: 2023–24 Edition
BrooksBurner replied to RichieNextel305's topic in New York Rangers
Then why were the Rangers not a playoff team before he got here? And why did a drafted group of players who never played together in Vegas make the Finals with him? -
Lafrenière Re-Re-Reset: 2023–24 Edition
BrooksBurner replied to RichieNextel305's topic in New York Rangers
Y u defendin GG bro? -
Lafrenière Re-Re-Reset: 2023–24 Edition
BrooksBurner replied to RichieNextel305's topic in New York Rangers
Re-watching this video hits different these days -
This team has a much larger concern about their top players disappearing. I don’t trust Panarin at all, and he’ll be gripping his stick tighter more than ever. I don’t think it’ll be a big issue against the Capitals, but for any team they would face after this round, I would expect Panarin to be on a milk carton again.
-
Lafrenière Re-Re-Reset: 2023–24 Edition
BrooksBurner replied to RichieNextel305's topic in New York Rangers
Yup. Gallant never got this Lafreniere. If he did, he wouldn't have been moving him around. Every time these debates come up, people only look at the players who took a step forward this year to discredit Gallant, and brush aside the ones who weren't as good as they were under Gallant. It's an agenda. -
Is this because I didn't return your call? I'm not interested
-
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
In case you bunch of unthankful ingrates forgot how clutch Kreider is in big games: -
i was looking for one. Why is it in the off the ice bar room delete this thread
-
https://bracketchallenge.nhl.com/en/leagues/53032 pw: bsbh2024
-
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
The Rangers should be a popular team to pick/bet against, but not against the Capitals. They are trying too hard to be edgy -
@The Dude right now:
-
Chytil should be a great fit for that line. He has an excellent shot, and he also has no issues carrying the puck or dumping and going in deep after it, cycling. Underrated playmaker too.
-
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
If Rempe is in the opening lineup and can do enough to get Wilson suckered into fighting, that would be a great exchange. For one, Wilson is one of the guys who can establish the tone of a game and be disruptive for the Caps. For two, any 4 on 4 situation is extremely favorable for the Rangers. -
He's gotta be ready to play. There's no reason for him to be taking those kinds of reps from others who are going to be playing...unless he's going to be playing.
-
-
Lafrenière Re-Re-Reset: 2023–24 Edition
BrooksBurner replied to RichieNextel305's topic in New York Rangers
-
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
Despite the subjectivity, the track record of correlation between expected goals and playoff participants and Cup winners is very strong (as far as expected goals from transparent data sources). There’s other factors, but nothing as strongly as that of which I am aware. Special teams dominance on both ends of the ice for example might show favoritism towards winning teams, but it hasn’t correlated with being a necessity. 5v5 play pretty much has until it shows out otherwise. If there’s one source that deviates heavily from the others, I’d be leery of that source and how they are getting what they are getting. Might be bias or questionable methodology. It could also be they are innovative and ahead of the curve, but there’s nothing that suggests the other sources have been errant. -
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
No, and yes. The Rangers landed the one team in the playoffs who suck more at 5v5 than they do. Combined with a major special teams edge, I'll be disappointed if they lose even 1 game. -
Playoffs Rangers-Capitals Round One — General Series Thread
BrooksBurner replied to Phil's topic in New York Rangers
No. It's a subjective calculation though and there's going to be different models. What is odd is CSA is the outlier when it comes to the Rangers, when compared to many other sources, including other professional analytics companies. Not just NST.