Phil Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Please be true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 If they took his whole salary next year I wouldn't even want anything in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abe Froman Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Fingers crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 If they took his whole salary next year I wouldn't even want anything in return. I'd add in Fast for the remainder of this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 20, 2020 Author Share Posted February 20, 2020 Go blockbuster. Hank, Kreider, and Fast (maybe Strome, too) for Bowers, Kaut, Jost, 1st, and conditional 1st (if they win the Cup). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliveIn94 Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Go blockbuster. Hank, Kreider, and Fast (maybe Strome, too) for Bowers, Kaut, Jost, 1st, and conditional 1st (if they win the Cup).Do you think we could get Newhook or is that too high a price? Sent from my Z981 using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 20, 2020 Author Share Posted February 20, 2020 I doubt Newhook or Byram can be had for anything. But you can probably get everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Please please please please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 What Twitter account is this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 No one is adding Lundqvist for “goaltender depth” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindG1000 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 No one is adding Lundqvist for “goaltender depth” You are when your depth is a banged up league average goalie and a 29 year old backup with no track record of success. You get the chance to add one of the best playoff goalies of the last two decades? You take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Not in real life, dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 No one is adding Lundqvist for “goaltender depth” I don't see it either with Grubauer under contract next season. The 8.5M price tag makes it hard to understand why they would do it especially for a back up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 #Becauseitsthecup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 It's pretty much the only fit out there. They could use a good goalie. So realistically, (my trade would be) the Rangers pay 50% of his deal add Fast and get back Nichushkin, and a 2nd rounder which is conditionally a 1st if they win the cup, and another 1st if they win next year (conditional on Lundqvists games played). Why does anyone want Jost? Crap, see if they want Staal or Smith. I'd take Zadorov in return to get rid of one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Why would anyone want Jost Directly followed by send them Staal or Smith :palm: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirtyONE Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Future considerations will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keirik Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 10 Swedish fish, a conditional pick, and a b prospect. We retain 2m max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBrowningPI Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 How about past considerations, like how they got raped on Ryan Graves. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Head Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I doubt Newhook or Byram can be had for anything. But you can probably get everything else. Lundy and Kakko Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Why would anyone want Jost Directly followed by send them Staal or Smith :palm: Well played. I actually meant to ask Why does everyone want Jost? His name continually comes up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjeitheday Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 People should not be excited to deal Lundqvist. It's disrespectful. He carried this sorry ass organization for over a decade. It would be one of the saddest days in Rangers history if he's dealt. That being said, I understand the positives and reasons for the move. It's business. I only wish Sather could have added that big offensive player to get him at least one cup. Hank's team never scored for crap in the playoffs for him. Sather went all in on Nash and failed miserably. It wasn't the right guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjeitheday Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Rumors out there about Skjei for Trochek. One, that would take away all leverage for Stome in the off-season. Two, he would probably do better offensively than Strome with Panarin. Three, he's a plus faceoff guy. Four, he's on a good contract that last a while longer. Five, dumping Skjei frees up a spot for another young defenseman ready to make the jump. Downside, Strome is a lot better defensively than Trochek and this team already gives up too many shots on goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 Rumors out there about Skjei for Trochek. One, that would take away all leverage for Stome in the off-season. Two, he would probably do better offensively than Strome with Panarin. Three, he's a plus faceoff guy. Four, he's on a good contract that last a while longer. Five, dumping Skjei frees up a spot for another young defenseman ready to make the jump. Downside, Strome is a lot better defensively than Trochek and this team already gives up too many shots on goal. According to who? ?Rumors out there,? isn?t how we reference things. Please credit the source, especially with a link. Sent from my iPhone using Blueshirts Brotherhood mobile app powered by Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now