Br4d Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 7 minutes ago, Pete said: Barkov will turn 29 shortly and Mika just turned 31. It's not that big a difference. And I don't really know what that has to do with the conversation. 29 is primetime. 31 is a step over the hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 15 minutes ago, Pete said: I'm sure that's the way you see it. It's what the stats say. It's also what the eye test said, unless you had a pair of rose-colored glasses on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 (edited) 21 minutes ago, BrooksBurner said: It's what the stats say. It's also what the eye test said, unless you had a pair of rose-colored glasses on. I'm sure you believe anyone who doesn't see things the way you do has the rose colored glasses on. Edited June 14 by Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, Pete said: I'm sure anyone who doesn't see things the way you do has the rose collared glasses on in your opinion. Because you see everything through a shroud of negativity. I’m sure that’s the way you see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, BrooksBurner said: I’m sure that’s the way you see it Good one. I'd ask if you thought that up all one your own, But like a lot of your best zingers, you're just copying me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 14 Author Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, Sharpshooter said: Yeah, that is another concern of mine. Mika is only going to get worse from here, not better. I still think he's got some good years left, but there are definitely more behind him than ahead of him. Right. You can see the near future, and it spells "checking line center." There's still value in that, but how much, relative to an $8.5 million cap hit? It's similar to the Trouba issue. You can find positives in these players, but those positives don't add up to being remotely justified to what they cost against your cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Run it back and tear it all down, especially Zibby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 hour ago, Pete said: Agree with a lot of this, but don't forget Zib also shut down Barkov offensively that series. So we’re paying $8.5M for a shutdown center? Essentially a 3rd liner job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog99 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Only if Laf puts him on his back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillyb Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 omg mika’s contract goes through 2030 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 39 minutes ago, Albatrosss said: So we’re paying $8.5M for a shutdown center? Essentially a 3rd liner job? Florida is paying 3.5M more for the same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Zib 5v5 against Florida: - outshot 67-23 - out high danger chanced 26-10 - 33 CF%, 24 xGF% - no goals for, 2 goals against 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 minute ago, BrooksBurner said: Zib 5v5 against Florida: - outshot 67-23 - out high danger chanced 26-10 - 33 CF%, 24 xGF% - no goals for, 2 goals against So he even sucks at shutting down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 8 minutes ago, Vodka Drunkenski said: Florida is paying 3.5M more for the same thing Who Barkov? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Just now, Albatrosss said: So he even sucks at shutting down? Correct. It was all Igor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Br4d Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 53 minutes ago, Albatrosss said: Run it back and tear it all down, especially Zibby. It's going to be much harder to tear down after next season. There are some people who are likely to lose a substantial part of their future value by then because they're at the age where 2024-2025 is a big part of their remaining value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 1 minute ago, Albatrosss said: Who Barkov? yes but I’ve already shown my math sucks so who knows with me anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 4 minutes ago, Vodka Drunkenski said: yes but I’ve already shown my math sucks so who knows with me anymore I guess for $11M you get the stanley cup and for $8.5M you get a whiffed one-timer on a PP. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 6 minutes ago, Br4d said: It's going to be much harder to tear down after next season. There are some people who are likely to lose a substantial part of their future value by then because they're at the age where 2024-2025 is a big part of their remaining value. But they must run it again. They came too close. You dont tear it down after having such a successful season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vodka Drunkenski Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 10 minutes ago, Albatrosss said: I guess for $11M you get the stanley cup and for $8.5M you get a whiffed one-timer on a PP. Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. They have bargains elsewhere that help them get over the top, it’s good front office and scouting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrooksBurner Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 3 minutes ago, Albatrosss said: But they must run it again. They came too close. You dont tear it down after having such a successful season. I think they have more information these days with the advancement of stat tracking. You can discern better between legitimate runs and fortunate runs. This was a fortunate run like two years ago. But also two years ago Florida won a President’s Trophy, made round 2, and still traded away a franchise player and a top 4 defenseman that summer. If they had the same mindset that they were close because of superficial results, they don’t make that deal even though it was Tkachuk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Br4d Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 16 minutes ago, Albatrosss said: But they must run it again. They came too close. You dont tear it down after having such a successful season. This could easily be the difference between being competitive in the next window and being hamstrung like we are in this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 16 minutes ago, Vodka Drunkenski said: Unfortunately it doesn’t work that way. They have bargains elsewhere that help them get over the top, it’s good front office and scouting. Pretty sure Barkov is twice the player Zibby is now. That’s what i meanr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 17 minutes ago, BrooksBurner said: I think they have more information these days with the advancement of stat tracking. You can discern better between legitimate runs and fortunate runs. This was a fortunate run like two years ago. But also two years ago Florida won a President’s Trophy, made round 2, and still traded away a franchise player and a top 4 defenseman that summer. If they had the same mindset that they were close because of superficial results, they don’t make that deal even though it was Tkachuk. It was not as fortunate as you’re suggesting. The team won the Presidents trophy. The team was good. but it’s Tkachuk. I’d trade anyone on this team for him not named Laffreniere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albatrosss Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 11 minutes ago, Br4d said: This could easily be the difference between being competitive in the next window and being hamstrung like we are in this one. Next window may not come for another 10 years. Or 30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now